Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg vs Edoardo Graziani Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schulenburg vs Graziani analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg vs Edoardo Graziani Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schulenburg 1 - 0 Graziani
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schulenburg has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Graziani has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schulenburg, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Graziani has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schulenburg has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Graziani has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schulenburg has won 60% of matches played (W/L 6/ 4), with Graziani winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schulenburg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Graziani has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 28/ 16), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 35/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Schulenburg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4), where as Graziani has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schulenburg winning 1 times and Graziani being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schulenburg winning 2 and Graziani winning 0. The last match between Schulenburg and Graziani was at the M15 L'Aquila, 14-07-2021, First, Clay with Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schulenburg and Graziani have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schulenburg winning 0 times and Graziani 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schulenburg winning 0, and Graziani 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schulenburg has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.3 while Graziani has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schulenburg has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Graziani has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schulenburg has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Graziani has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
59% (38-26)
Career Total W/L
62% (63-38)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg vs Edoardo Graziani For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Schulenburg VS Graziani
Sportsbook
Offer
Schulenburg VS Graziani H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg | Edoardo Graziani |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (42/63) | 60% (32/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (28/42) | 56% (18/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (12/21) | 48% (10/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (25/53) | 37% (23/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Schulenburg VS Graziani H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Edoardo Graziani
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg | Edoardo Graziani |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Tim Handel
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francois Musitelli
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Karl Friberg
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Guy Den Ouden
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Liam Gavrielides
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Edoardo Graziani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Edoardo Graziani
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Graziani
Player
Sean Hess
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
97)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
50%
(
42 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(9) 7-5 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Bresciani
Player
Edoardo Graziani
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edoardo Graziani
Player
Gregorio Biondolillo
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
55
|
2-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Sebesta
Player
Edoardo Graziani
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edoardo Graziani
Player
Laurin Aerne
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Edoardo Graziani
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Schulenburg Vs Graziani Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Schulenburg are available here and Graziani photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
